Attorneys at Law
521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10175
Tel: (212) 488-6899 · ImmigrationLex.com
U.S. immigration law is federal:
Our attorneys can represent you from New York,
no matter where you are located,
in any state, in any country.
Attorneys Practicing U.S. Immigration Law Since 1991
Most EB-5 investors today do not go out and run a business of their own. They invest through a regional center, a USCIS-designated entity that sponsors projects and pools capital from a number of immigrant investors. Congress created this route in 1992 as a pilot and has kept it alive by periodic reauthorization ever since. The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 rebuilt it, and immigrant visas are currently authorized under the Regional Center Program through September 30, 2027.
A regional center is an economic unit, public or private, that USCIS has designated to promote economic growth in a defined part of the United States. It applies for that designation on Form I-956. Before investors can rely on a particular project, the center must also file Form I-956F seeking approval of that specific investment offering, and it must file an annual statement on Form I-956G describing what it has done with investor money.
The center is a sponsor and a compliance structure, not the business itself. Your capital goes into a new commercial enterprise associated with the center, which in turn deploys it into one or more job-creating projects.
The decisive advantage is how jobs are counted. An investor operating independently must show that the enterprise itself directly employs ten qualifying workers. A regional center investor may count indirect and induced jobs, calculated through accepted economic modeling, and up to 90 percent of the ten-job requirement can be satisfied that way. In practice this is what makes construction and development projects workable, though Congress has limited how jobs from construction activity lasting less than two years may be counted.
The second advantage is the level of involvement required. EB-5 always demands that the investor be engaged in management through day-to-day responsibility or policy formulation, but the policy-making rights an ordinary limited partner holds are enough. That allows people with businesses and families abroad to qualify without relocating to run a company.
Regional center projects also tend to be located where the reduced investment threshold of $800,000 applies, and where a project sits in a rural area, a high-unemployment area, or a qualifying infrastructure project, the investor may draw on the visas Congress reserved for those categories, which have generally moved faster than the unreserved line.
Anyone reading older material about this program should understand how much of it is obsolete. The Regional Center Program lapsed entirely in mid-2021 and was dark until the 2022 Act revived it, leaving investors already in the queue in an unpleasant limbo. The old arrangement under which 5,000 of the annual EB-5 visas were set aside for regional center investors no longer exists; the current reserved categories are defined by the type of project rather than by whether a regional center is involved. Existing centers had to re-apply under the new framework rather than simply carrying their old designations forward.
The Act also imposed an integrity regime that did not exist before. USCIS must audit every designated regional center at least once every five years, reviewing its records and tracing the flow of investor capital, and it conducts site visits. Each center pays an annual Integrity Fund fee of $20,000, or $10,000 if it had 20 or fewer investors in the preceding fiscal year, and a center that fails to pay faces termination. Centers must disclose fees and compensation paid to promoters, and certain people with a history of fraud or securities violations are barred from involvement.
This is the point most worth absorbing. USCIS designating a regional center is a regulatory status, not an endorsement of the center, its managers, or any project it sponsors. The agency does not vouch for the financial merits of an offering, and it has terminated a considerable number of centers over the years. Approval of a project on Form I-956F likewise addresses the immigration criteria, not whether the investment is sound.
If a regional center, new commercial enterprise, or job-creating entity is terminated or debarred while your case is pending, the 2022 Act does give investors a route to preserve eligibility, and Form I-526E can be used to report the amendments needed to keep the petition on foot. That is a rescue provision, however, not a substitute for choosing carefully at the outset. It costs time, and time is the one thing an EB-5 investor cannot easily replace.
Is the center's designation current, and has it paid its Integrity Fund fee? Has an I-956F been filed or approved for the specific project you are being offered, and does the offering you are shown match it? Who prepared the economic report, and how many of the projected jobs are direct rather than modeled? How is your capital secured relative to the developer's own money and to any bank lending? What happens if the project is delayed past the point when your conditions come up for removal, and what does the operating agreement say about redeployment of your capital afterward? Who is being paid to introduce you to this project, and how much?