The requirement. Where an employment-based immigrant petition rests on an offer of employment, the petition must be accompanied by evidence that the prospective United States employer is able to pay the wage offered. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The employer’s ability to pay is treated as one of the essential elements in deciding whether the job offered to the beneficiary is realistic.
Where the rule comes from. The requirement is imposed by a federal regulation, not by an internal agency instruction. It is codified at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), a provision issued through rulemaking by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service and now part of the immigration regulations administered by the Department of Homeland Security. USCIS is the component that applies the provision when it adjudicates immigrant petitions, and the reference to “the Service” in the regulatory text below is to that predecessor agency rather than to USCIS.
The text of the regulation. The governing provision reads:
Ability of prospective employer to pay wage. Any petition filed by or for an employment-based immigrant which requires an offer of employment must be accompanied by evidence that the prospective United States employer has the ability to pay the proffered wage. The petitioner must demonstrate this ability at the time the priority date is established and continuing until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. Evidence of this ability shall be either in the form of copies of annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements. In a case where the prospective United States employer employs 100 or more workers, the director may accept a statement from a financial officer of the organization which establishes the prospective employer’s ability to pay the proffered wage. In appropriate cases, additional evidence, such as profit/loss statements, bank account records, or personnel records, may be submitted by the petitioner or requested by the Service.
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
Which petitions the requirement reaches. The requirement follows the offer of employment rather than the preference category, so it does not apply to every employment-based petition. It applies to petitions supported by a permanent labor certification, and equally to the categories that require a job offer even though no labor certification is needed, such as outstanding professors and researchers, 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(i)(3)(iv), and multinational executives and managers, 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(5). It does not apply where the regulations require no offer of employment at all, which is the case for petitions based on extraordinary ability, 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5), and for petitions in which the job offer requirement is exempted because the exemption is in the national interest, 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(ii).
The period that must be covered. The showing is not a snapshot taken at the moment of filing. Ability to pay the proffered wage must exist as of the priority date and must continue until the beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence, which means the financial record supporting the petition may span several years. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
Initial evidence. The regulation calls for annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements. Where the prospective employer has one hundred or more workers, the adjudicator may instead accept a statement from a financial officer of the organization, but the regulation permits that substitution rather than requiring it.
How ability to pay is measured. Agency guidance directs adjudicators to weigh all evidence bearing on the petitioner’s financial strength and the significance of its business activity. Three showings ordinarily carry the point: documented payment to the beneficiary of a salary equal to or greater than the proffered wage for each year from the priority date, net income equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or net current assets equal to or greater than the proffered wage. None of the three dispenses with the required initial evidence, which must still appear in the record even where the beneficiary has in fact been paid the full wage.
Other evidence. Profit or loss statements, bank account records, and personnel records may be submitted by the petitioner or requested by the agency, and other financial measures may also be considered. Such material must be credible and relevant, and it must establish ability to pay when read together with the required initial evidence. The analysis takes account of the totality of the petitioner’s circumstances, so an operating loss in a particular period is not automatically fatal where the record as a whole shows the capacity to pay the wage.
Current agency guidance. The working instructions that adjudicators follow under this regulation are consolidated in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part E, Chapter 4, which is the source to consult for the agency’s present approach.
Why the issue is examined early. Because the requirement goes to whether the petition can be approved at all, and because it must be satisfied across a period rather than on a single day, the prospective employer’s financial position is best assessed before a case is prepared rather than after a request for evidence arrives.
Related pages. For the evidence the agency looks to first, see the primary evidence of the employer’s ability to pay. For the surrounding subjects, see common issues relating to employment-based green cards and employment-based green cards. Inquiries may be directed through the contact page.